![]() ![]() Republican strategists believe their new attack-line on Mr Biden, that he is incompetent, will prove more effective than their old one, that he is a doddery slave to the far-left. Given how few Americans have strong views on Afghanistan even now (though most say they are for leaving it) it is safe to assume it will not be a major issue in next year’s mid-terms. Most Americans recognised that both parties had been culpable for Vietnam, just as they have been for Afghanistan and they had anyway moved on to more pressing economic concerns. ![]() Just 18 months after the end of America’s far bigger catastrophe in Vietnam, Bob Dole found no purchase, in a vice-presidential debate with Walter Mondale, for his caustic reference to “Democrat wars”. Unless the Taliban or their terrorist allies start killing many Americans, history suggests most of this will pass. Mr Biden ignored their advice in pushing ahead with the withdrawal, and their reputations have now been tarnished by it. The top brass and intelligence agencies are also unhappy. Bob Menendez, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has announced his intention to hold hearings into both the Trump deal and Biden withdrawal. And many Democrats, dismayed by a display of the sort of incompetence they associated with the Trump administration, are not rushing to his defence. According to Mitch McConnell, “He owns it.” Senator Rick Scott of Florida has suggested Mr Biden should be removed from office. The party’s leaders, having had all enthusiastic reference to Mr Trump’s peace plan expunged from its websites, are seeking to blame 20 years of failure on the Democratic president. Many Republicans had been reluctant to criticise Mr Biden’s execution of a Trump policy in Afghanistan they are now unloading on him with pent-up gusto. Chafing against the condescension that he has received throughout his long, error-strewn career-from journalists and pundits who have never won an election-he is hair-triggered to stick it to his critics. The president’s scrappy-kid-from-Scranton shtick is not entirely cosmetic. And Mr Biden may be especially averse to them. Partisan politics, to which foreign policy is now largely subject, does not reward admissions of error. ![]() Barack Obama has called his failure to enforce his injunction against Bashar al-Assad’s chemical-weapon use one of his proudest moments. None of Mr Biden’s other recent predecessors owned up to their big screw-ups, either. ![]() It was depressing, but not all that surprising. Aside from an implausible-and swiftly debunked-claim by Mr Biden that America had not previously evacuated many vulnerable Afghans because they had not wanted to leave, the president’s lengthy self-justification seemed mostly intended to distract attention from that disaster. It was his administration’s astonishing lack of preparedness for the Taliban’s takeover. Above all, the catastrophe that Mr Biden was required to answer for this week was not the decades-long failure in Afghanistan, or even his decision to draw a line under it. Nor is it clear that staying on would have meant escalating the war, in which America has lost 24 soldiers in combat in the past two and a half years. And the Democratic president was not always so sceptical of the effort to build an Afghan state he was initially supportive of it. The country’s forces folded only after Mr Trump cut a deal with their enemies then Mr Biden cut their air and logistical support. In fact, around 70,000 Afghan soldiers and policemen have died fighting the Taliban. He appears to have acquired some of Mr Trump’s disingenuous method as well as his Afghanistan policy. And to those who believe he should not have gone ahead with the withdrawal plan he inherited from Donald Trump, Mr Biden said he would in that case have been forced to escalate the war: “How many more lives, American lives, is it worth, how many endless rows of headstones at Arlington National Cemetery?” State-building was anyway not their mission in Afghanistan, he said rooting out terrorists was. If the Afghans would not fight to protect their fledgling state, he could not ask Americans to. He claimed the collapse of Afghanistan’s security forces was not an indictment of his decision to withdraw America’s troops from the country, but a vindication of it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |